Turns out they decided to revamp the UI with almost 0 feature inclusions. Anyway, when bluebeam for mac 2.0 came out, we bought in thinking that we'd be getting all of the features that we were missing along with performance improvements. What's more we really felt the lack of some features from the windows side, many of which were so basic that it's laughable that Bluebeam decided not to invest in them. considering that we regularly deal with 100+ page architectural sets, this made the program worthless in a lot of cases. It took several seconds to render every page. It became clear within the first week of using the software, though, that it was incredibly slow. I went ahead and gave the presentation anyway, though and with some convincing, we bought seats for everyone. Playing with the trial version of 1.0, though, I quickly realized that a ton of features were absent from the windows version.

I even gave a lunchtime presentation to show everyone some of the really powerful features I had come to know and love from the windows side. The last 3 are at my most recent job, and when I found out that Bluebeam had created a Revu for Mac, I was quick to push our company to adopt. I've been using Revu for about 8 years, 5 of those on Windows. It has given them a sense of invincibility that has led to stagnation and a lack of genuine support for their customers. I wish there was another one out there so that these guys didn't have a monopoly on the market. To my knowledge, no other PDF software is geared towards the A+E market. Untrustworthy Developer - Dropped the ballīrings a lot of features and functionality missing from Acrobat.

Bluebeam revu standard pricing